Charlie Moad wrote:
Typically I use OSX's python, but I don't want to start that debate.
No need for debate, I just wanted to know, so I wouldn't be duplicating effort. I'm trying to support the new Universal Build (and the 2.4.1 Framework Build before that), so I wanted to know if I'm duplicating effort.
New users should probably be
pointed to the prebuilt 2.4 framework on pythonmac.
Yup!
I haven't been keeping up with the intel status though.
There is a new universal build of 2.4.3 We're all hoping it will become the "standard" build for OS-X >= 10.3.9, for both PPC and Intel. However, it can't really be that until we can get all the critical packages built for it. wxPython is a big hang up now, and I consider matplotlib critical too.
Are eggs accepted by pythonmac yet or they still using mpkg's exclusively?
We'd like to put eggs on there too. ideally, we'd make a little launcher app that would fire up and run easy_install to install them when double clicked. That's been talked about, but not yet done. In the meantime, something is better than nothing!
Cocoa-agg works and has been there for the last few releases.
Will it build by default on OS-X?
Apple's
python interface to quartz doesn't have much of the text support
included.
Darn. And it's proprietary isn't it?
I think it is much better to focus on the Agg backend and
use it in gui toolkits.
That is a good plan, unless we go to using All-Cairo Doing both seems way too redundant. I'm investigating Cairo vs. Agg for another project.
These are my quick thoughts:
Cairo Pluses:
In theory: native, hardware accelerated back-ends for various platforms
PDF and PS support: That's very nice, then we'd really have only one back-end! (what about Tex?)
It's being used for GTK2 and part of Mozilla, so it should see a lot of activity and testing.
Cairo Minuses:
It doesn't look like there's much activity on Windows, but that's gotten better with the Mozilla folks getting involved. I don't know about OS-X
Agg pluses:
It works now!
It has fabulous anti-aliasing (I haven't compared to Cairo yet)
It's smaller and simpler.
Anyone else have some thoughts?
-Chris
···
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@...259...