I didn't provide any masked array checks in any of the contains methods
that I wrote. Do any of these need to be fixed?
I won't have a lot of time over the next few months, and I will be
slow to fix them.
- Paul
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:55:14AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
2) The picking code for a line assumes non-masked arrays. Since the
Line class already keeps around a "compressed" version of the data for
drawing, it is easy enough to use that instead of the raw data.
They do need to be fixed, but this is not a high priority item. Let's
wait until the new maskedarray code that is now in a numpy branch goes
live and official before we invest too much energy in getting masked
arrays working properly here.
JDH
On Feb 19, 2008 5:45 PM, Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@...537...> wrote:
I didn't provide any masked array checks in any of the contains methods
that I wrote. Do any of these need to be fixed?
John Hunter wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 5:45 PM, Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@...537...> wrote:
I didn't provide any masked array checks in any of the contains methods
that I wrote. Do any of these need to be fixed?They do need to be fixed, but this is not a high priority item. Let's
wait until the new maskedarray code that is now in a numpy branch goes
live and official before we invest too much energy in getting masked
arrays working properly here.
The maskedarray branch has been merged into the svn trunk and will therefore be in the 1.05 release, coming within days.
Eric