I suggest we make a 1.1.x branch from the current state of master, and
consider it as a placeholder for now. Then we bump the version number
in the py3 repo to *2.0*, merge py3/master back into mpl/master, and
delete the py3 repo. The reason for bumping to v2.0 is simply to draw
everyone's attention to the fact the next release will be the first to
drop support for<=python-2.5. Once folks start working with the
master (2.0) branch, if we have any complaints that a version 1.1
release was needed after all, we can cut it from the 1.1.x placeholder
branch.
This works for me -- I obviously dropped the ball pushing for a 1.1
release, but this will be a good impetus. Should we give people a
couple of days to close any open tickets they want or push any last
minute changes in that we want before making the 1.1 release branch?
Once we branch, I suggest only release critical bug fixes go in as we
discussed last.
Each pull request gets assigned to an issue.
How do I apply labels to an issue with an associated pull request? I see how to do it for free-standing issues, but not the pull request ones.
I just added two labels
in the github issue tracker: wishlist and ongoing.
So, to be clear, "wishlist" means "would be nice to have, but no real target date", and "ongoing" means someone is working on it?
I also created two
milestones: v1.1.0 and v2.0.0. Could the devs please look through the
issues and assign each one to either one of the milestones or apply
the wishlist label? I could try to merge the issues from sourceforge
as well, though that may take some time.
It would be nice to merge those in -- wasn't there some tools other projects were using to import them en masse? If we do so, I would also suggest (somewhat controversially) that we deleted everything before some arbitrary cut off date. There are a lot of really old, and most likely obsolete bugs in there, and we should probably just declare bankruptcy on them.
Cheers,
Mike
···
On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:06 AM, John Hunter<jdh2358@...149...> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Darren Dale<dsdale24@...149...> wrote:
--
Michael Droettboom
Science Software Branch
Space Telescope Science Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, USA