[matplotlib] Provide ipython 0.11 compatibility (#411)

Can we please just release something now, so Debian doesn't have to come up with their own modification of 1.0.1?

Eric

···

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [matplotlib] Provide ipython 0.11 compatibility (#411)
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:28:03 -0700
From: sandrotosi <reply+i-1338638-66dc35c308f2ee0898dbcfefd387d9c19d5a0805@...1003...>
To: efiring@...229...

Hi Eric,

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 19:59, efiring <reply@...1003...> wrote:

As far as I know, mpl master is fully consistent with IPython 0.11. Do
you have evidence or examples to the contrary?

Sorry I was too dense :slight_smile:

Currently in Debian we provide mpl 1.0.1 and we'd like to also ship
ipython 0.11 . I've received a bug report where it states that mpl
1.0.1 needs to be adapted in order to work correctly with ipy 0.11
(and I hope the reported did his homework before submitting :slight_smile: .

From your reply I guess there was some work that it's maybe only on
master and was not released with 1.0.1 ? If so, can you please point
me to the relevant commits, so I can cherrypick them and update the
debian package?

I tried a very basic example, "plot([1, 2], [2, 4])", and it works
fine, but there might be some other snippets failing.

Thanks for your help,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/411#issuecomment-1720408

As far as I am concerned, the only thing stopping us from releasing is:

  1. There are figures that are failing to be generated by sphinx. I have noticed that all failed figures come from example code that uses “if name == ‘main’” in the source. I have not investigated this further.

  2. Need to update the docs to point to new bug-tracker, refer to the new version number in the main sidebar, and add a “What’s New” section.

To me, everything else is incidental and are not show-stoppers.

Ben Root

···

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Eric Firing <efiring@…229…> wrote:

Can we please just release something now, so Debian doesn’t have to come

up with their own modification of 1.0.1?

Eric

And Sandro mentioned this via about the ipython directive and console
highlighting: "You need to update ipython_directive.py and
ipython_console_highlighting.py.
Newer versions are available in the ipython source but they are not well
tested yet, please report problems upstream."

JDH

···

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Benjamin Root <ben.root@...553...> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Eric Firing <efiring@...229...> wrote:

Can we please just release something now, so Debian doesn't have to come
up with their own modification of 1.0.1?

Eric

As far as I am concerned, the only thing stopping us from releasing is:

1) There are figures that are failing to be generated by sphinx. I have
noticed that all failed figures come from example code that uses "if
__name__ == '__main__'" in the source. I have not investigated this
further.

2) Need to update the docs to point to new bug-tracker, refer to the new
version number in the main sidebar, and add a "What's New" section.

To me, everything else is incidental and are not show-stoppers.