Folks,
I've just noticed that in order to get the size of a figure in inches, one can
use:
fig.get_size_inches()
However, the corresponding 'set' method is
fig.set_figsize_inches()
Is this intentional ? Wouldn't it be better to keep the set/get methods
consistent ?
Thx for your insight
P.
Agreed. fig.set_figsize seems redundant, so I am changing it to
fig.set_size_inches. The old one will still be present, but will
issue a deprecation warning. I'll commit these changes soon.
- Charlie
On 8/29/06, PGM <pgmdevlist@...287...> wrote:
Folks,
I've just noticed that in order to get the size of a figure in inches, one can
use:
>>> fig.get_size_inches()
However, the corresponding 'set' method is
>>>fig.set_figsize_inches()Is this intentional ? Wouldn't it be better to keep the set/get methods
consistent ?Thx for your insight