OLD: wxBitmap *bitmap = new wxBitmap(image); NEW
> wxBitmap *bitmap = new wxBitmap(*image);
Hey Chris, thanks for this info. Do we expect this modified code to
also work for older versions of wx, or is this 2.8 specific.
> Is anyone maintaining the wx back-end now?
Noone officially. Ken and Charlie both have commit privileges and
have worked on wx, but noone has volunteered to be the designated goto
person.
JDH
John Hunter wrote:
> OLD: wxBitmap *bitmap = new wxBitmap(image); NEW
> wxBitmap *bitmap = new wxBitmap(*image);Hey Chris, thanks for this info. Do we expect this modified code to
also work for older versions of wx, or is this 2.8 specific.
I think it will work with older versions, but I haven't tested it. How far back do we need to go? I think 2.6.3 ( the last "stable" release ) should do it.
Aside from this, that's relevant if I ever find the time to work on other parts of the wx backends.
I'll try to test.
Noone officially. Ken and Charlie both have commit privileges and
have worked on wx,
Ken has said he's going to try to take a look soon, but we're all busy!
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@...259...
John Hunter wrote:
Hey Chris, thanks for this info. Do we expect this modified code to
also work for older versions of wx, or is this 2.8 specific.I think it will work with older versions, but I haven't tested it. How
far back do we need to go? I think 2.6.3 ( the last "stable" release )
should do it.
The current Debian stable (e.g. Sarge) has wxWindows 2.4.3.1.
Noone officially. Ken and Charlie both have commit privileges and
have worked on wx,Ken has said he's going to try to take a look soon, but we're all busy!
I'm planning to make time for this, and a slew of other wx backend stuff, in early February.
Ken
On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
Ken McIvor wrote:
I think it will work with older versions, but I haven't tested it. How
far back do we need to go? I think 2.6.3 ( the last "stable" release )
should do it.The current Debian stable (e.g. Sarge) has wxWindows 2.4.3.1.
Really? Darn, 2.4 is very old for wxPython.
Do a lot of folks only use the official packages?
I'm planning to make time for this, and a slew of other wx backend stuff, in early February.
Great! thanks.
-Chris
On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@...259...
Ken McIvor wrote:
I think it will work with older versions, but I haven't tested it. How
far back do we need to go? I think 2.6.3 ( the last "stable" release )
should do it.The current Debian stable (e.g. Sarge) has wxWindows 2.4.3.1.
Really? Darn, 2.4 is very old for wxPython.
Yep! You have no idea how happy I'll be when Etch comes out...
Do a lot of folks only use the official packages?
I can't give you a confident yes, but I would imagine so. I'm using them on deployed systems, so it's worth it to me to ensure compatibility.
Ken
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: