Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case?
-Chris
···
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver <thomas@...1071...> wrote:
On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker <chris.barker@...236...> wrote:
(the license looks BSD-ish to me)
At a glance, I think it's the X11 license, aka MIT license.
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@...236...
Not from the license point of view - the X11 license is another
permissive BSD-style license. I was just furnishing that detail. 
Thomas
···
On 1 May 2012 17:26, Chris Barker <chris.barker@...236...> wrote:
Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case?
AFAIK, no, it shouldn’t be a problem. The question is where. I suspect it would fit best as a mpl_toolkit.
Ben Root
P.S. - Of course, you do realize that you are essentially making yourself the de facto maintainer of it, right?
···
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Barker <chris.barker@…236…> wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver <thomas@…1071…> wrote:
On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker <chris.barker@…236…> wrote:
(the license looks BSD-ish to me)
At a glance, I think it’s the X11 license, aka MIT license.
Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case?
-Chris
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Benjamin Root
AFAIK, no, it shouldn't be a problem. The question is where. I suspect it
would fit best as a mpl_toolkit.
yes -- I figured that was most likely.
P.S. - Of course, you do realize that you are essentially making yourself
the de facto maintainer of it, right?
Well, me or Matt or Carlo -- we'll fight over that among ourselves.
-Chris
···
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@...236...