v1.1.1rc2 tarballs are up

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/

As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on
the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the
binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site.

A copy of the site docs are available at
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

John,

Is it intentional that the tarballs include doc/build?

Eric

···

On 06/09/2012 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/

As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on
the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the
binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site.

A copy of the site docs are available at
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

It isn't intentional and it looks like it only affected the "notests"
dist. Fixed it -- thanks for catching it.

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Eric Firing <efiring@...229...> wrote:

On 06/09/2012 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

John,

Is it intentional that the tarballs include doc/build?

It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of _backend_gdk.c) and some others like it.

Which raises the question: why are these temporary copies needed at all? I don't see any explanation in setupext.py. I imagine it has to do with how some systems handle the leading underscore on the name, but it would be nice to have it explained in a comment in setupext.py.

Eric

···

On 06/09/2012 12:21 PM, John Hunter wrote:

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Eric Firing<efiring@...229...> wrote:

On 06/09/2012 11:14 AM, John Hunter wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

John,

Is it intentional that the tarballs include doc/build?

It isn't intentional and it looks like it only affected the "notests"
dist. Fixed it -- thanks for catching it.

OK, I'll rebuild them super clean... I know what went wrong.

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <efiring@...229...> wrote:

It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of
_backend_gdk.c) and some others like it.

Just uploaded two new files built from clean git checkouts.

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, John Hunter <jdh2358@...149...> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <efiring@...229...> wrote:

It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of
_backend_gdk.c) and some others like it.

OK, I'll rebuild them super clean... I know what went wrong.

Don’t forget to tag the rc in git!

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, John Hunter <jdh2358@…149…> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, John Hunter <jdh2358@…714…> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Eric Firing <efiring@…229…> wrote:

It also has backend_gdk.c (supposed to be a temporary copy of

_backend_gdk.c) and some others like it.

OK, I’ll rebuild them super clean… I know what went wrong.

Just uploaded two new files built from clean git checkouts.


Live Security Virtual Conference

Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and

threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions

will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware

threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/


Matplotlib-devel mailing list

Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Hi John,

the matplotlib-1.1.1rc2.win installers are at <http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#matplotlib>. I am again unable to upload them to SF.

They are built against numpy 1.6.2 and include the test files. All tests pass on Python 2.7, 32 and 64 bit.

Christoph

···

On 6/9/2012 2:14 PM, John Hunter wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/

As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on
the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the
binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site.

A copy of the site docs are available at
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/

Thanks -- I've already started the process for the files, but can you
test upload something into the 1.1 folder (easy to subsequently
delete). I just made you a project admin. I'd like to get this
figure out eventually!

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke@...244...> wrote:

Hi John,

the matplotlib-1.1.1rc2.win installers are at
<http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#matplotlib>. I am again unable
to upload them to SF.

They are built against numpy 1.6.2 and include the test files. All tests
pass on Python 2.7, 32 and 64 bit.

Christoph

On 6/9/2012 2:14 PM, John Hunter wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/

As soon as we get binaries, I'll send out another call for testing on
the users list. Russell and Christoph, easiest if you just upload the
binaries directly. You should both have permissions on the sf site.

A copy of the site docs are available at
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/rc/v1.1.1rc2/

Debian package built and uploaded - thanks!

Cheers,

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, John Hunter <jdh2358@...149...> wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/

--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Testing looks good only two known fails for me against the rc2 binaries that
I spotted on SF on both Windows7 amd64 and Windows XP x86_32 (both Python
2.7.3).

The only thing out of the ordinary for me is the following on both:

matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_markevery_line.test ... ok
C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\lines.py:461: RuntimeWarning:
invalid value encountered in greater_equal
  return np.alltrue(x[1:]-x[0:-1]>=0)
matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_nonfinite_limits.test ... ok

I'd seen this on Sandro Tosi's output on this ML, is this a known numpy
issue? (using the Christoph Gohlke 1.6.2 MKL binaries)

Thanks,
RuiDC

···

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/v1.1.1rc2-tarballs-are-up-tp33987325p33993195.html
Sent from the matplotlib - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from?
I’ll go ahead and tag it.

Mike
···

http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

yep: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-June/062734.html

···

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:40 PM, RuiDC <ruidc@...42...> wrote:

Testing looks good only two known fails for me against the rc2 binaries that
I spotted on SF on both Windows7 amd64 and Windows XP x86_32 (both Python
2.7.3).

The only thing out of the ordinary for me is the following on both:

matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_markevery_line.test ... ok
C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\lines.py:461: RuntimeWarning:
invalid value encountered in greater_equal
return np.alltrue(x[1:]-x[0:-1]>=0)
matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_nonfinite_limits.test ... ok

I'd seen this on Sandro Tosi's output on this ML, is this a known numpy
issue? (using the Christoph Gohlke 1.6.2 MKL binaries)

--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614

···

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe@...31...> wrote:

John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I'll go
ahead and tag it.

John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I'll go
ahead and tag it.

https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614

Thanks. Done.

Here's what it was, if curious:

>git tag v1.1.1-rc2 97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614
>git push --tags upstream
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
To git@...679...:matplotlib/matplotlib.git
  * [new tag] v1.1.1-rc2 -> v1.1.1-rc2

Mike

···

On 06/11/2012 02:17 PM, John Hunter wrote:

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Droettboom<mdroe@...31...> wrote:

Is there a slight mix-up in the commits? In the email John sent out, it had commit f763cd11f50437568f8146b822ca8f25647cbb61 at the top of the log (alternative baseline image for mathfont_stix_14.png).

Just checking.

Ben Root

···

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe@…31…> wrote:

On 06/11/2012 02:17 PM, John Hunter wrote:

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael Droettboom<mdroe@…31…> wrote:

John: Do you know which git revision you made the tarballs from? I’ll go

ahead and tag it.

https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614

Thanks. Done.

Here’s what it was, if curious:

git tag v1.1.1-rc2 97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614

git push --tags upstream

Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)

To git@…679…:matplotlib/matplotlib.git

  • [new tag] v1.1.1-rc2 -> v1.1.1-rc2

Mike

Which e-mail is this? I couldn’t figure out what commit the tarball
was based on which is why I asked John. If we can confirm the
correct commit, I’m happy to move the tag.
Mike

···

On 06/13/2012 01:29 PM, Benjamin Root
wrote:

    On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Michael

Droettboom <mdroe@…31…>
wrote:

On 06/11/2012 02:17 PM, John Hunter wrote:

        > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael

Droettboom<mdroe@…31… >
wrote:

        >> John: Do you know which git revision you made the

tarballs from? I’ll go

        >> ahead and tag it.

        > [https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614](https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614)

Thanks. Done.

      Here's what it was, if curious:



       >git tag v1.1.1-rc2

97f713098a71c70d70c46602794c2a0fd126b614

       >git push --tags upstream

      Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)

      To  * [new tag]         v1.1.1-rc2 -> v1.1.1-rc2

Mike

      Is there a slight mix-up in the commits?  In the email John

sent out, it had commit
f763cd11f50437568f8146b822ca8f25647cbb61 at the top of the log
(alternative baseline image for mathfont_stix_14.png).

      Just checking.

git@…679…:matplotlib/matplotlib.git

The tag is correct, the email log had an extra commit in it that is
not in the rc. My bad.

···

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe@...31...> wrote:

Is there a slight mix-up in the commits? In the email John sent out, it had
commit f763cd11f50437568f8146b822ca8f25647cbb61 at the top of the log
(alternative baseline image for mathfont_stix_14.png).

Hi all,

···

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, John Hunter <jdh2358@...149...> wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

Is there a timeline for the final release? The Debian freeze is
announced for June 30th.

Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Well, looks like we better get moving then ;-). I have some time today to do this (sorry for dropping out last week). The only PR I see that perhaps should go in is https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/961

Anything I’m missing? I’m going to start testing this for the final release and will put something out later today Sandro.

···

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Sandro Tosi <morph@…12…> wrote:

Hi all,

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, John Hunter <jdh2358@…149…> wrote:

I just uploaded the v1.1.1rc2 tarballs to the sourceforge site

Is there a timeline for the final release? The Debian freeze is

announced for June 30th.

Cheers,

Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)

My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/

Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi