Timezone response of date2num and mx2num differs

I just did another test. mx2num fails for dates prior to

    > 1970 because it uses the magical Unix seconds from epoch.
    > We need mx2num to work for the whole range of dates for
    > which date2num works-at least that is my vote. Delbert

If you feel up to making an mx2num that satisfies these requirements,
I'm happy to include it as a patch.



On Wednesday 02 February 2005 10:10 am, Delbert D. Franz wrote: