and didn't have any problem. I running debian, where
> 2.95 is still the "standard". Maybe this could be
> changed in CVS - just for one more year or so
For independent reasons, I already did away with numeric limits in
_transforms.cpp a couple of weeks ago and these changes are in CVS.
If one of you would be willing to try and compile CVS against gcc
2.95.2, I would be interested to hear how it works, and will be happy
to make any required changes.