Actually, with xticklabels/yticklabels the zoom functionality for the
image is broken, so I still need a better solution.
···
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Edin Salkovic <edin.salkovic@...287...> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Edin Salkovic <edin.salkovic@...287...> wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?
xticklabels/yticklabels did the job.
Sorry for the noise.
Edin Salkovic wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?
xticklabels/yticklabels did the job.
Sorry for the noise.
Actually, with xticklabels/yticklabels the zoom functionality for the
image is broken, so I still need a better solution.
Try the extent kwarg for imshow:
*extent*: [ None | scalars (left, right, bottom, top) ]
Eata values of the axes. The default assigns zero-based row,
column indices to the *x*, *y* centers of the pixels.
So you would do:
imshow(data, extent=(l, r, b, t))
Ryan
···
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Edin Salkovic <edin.salkovic@...287...> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Edin Salkovic <edin.salkovic@...287...> wrote:
--
Ryan May
Graduate Research Assistant
School of Meteorology
University of Oklahoma
Yes, this works, thanks! The weird thing is that the first time I
tried "extent" it didn't work (i.e. I messed up something ).
Edin
···
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Ryan May <rmay31@...287...> wrote:
Try the extent kwarg for imshow:
*extent*: [ None | scalars (left, right, bottom, top) ]
Eata values of the axes. The default assigns zero-based row,
column indices to the *x*, *y* centers of the pixels.
So you would do:
imshow(data, extent=(l, r, b, t))