However, the transform is not being passed to draw_lines,
> and so the method works as if the old API were being
> used. Is this a bug? Shouldn't the transform be provided
> to draw_lines when using the new API?
Yes, it should be passed. I recommend removing the transform=None
functionality to *require* the transform be passed. If it is not,
then an exception will be raised and it will be easy to track down the
errant call.
JDH
The problem is in draw_line_collection, and it looks complicated.
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 18:25, John Hunter wrote:
> However, the transform is not being passed to draw_lines,
> and so the method works as if the old API were being
> used. Is this a bug? Shouldn't the transform be provided
> to draw_lines when using the new API?Yes, it should be passed. I recommend removing the transform=None
functionality to *require* the transform be passed. If it is not,
then an exception will be raised and it will be easy to track down the
errant call.
I committed this change to svn. I'll leave it up to you whether to change it
back for an actual release.
Darren
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 18:25, you wrote:
> However, the transform is not being passed to draw_lines,
> and so the method works as if the old API were being
> used. Is this a bug? Shouldn't the transform be provided
> to draw_lines when using the new API?Yes, it should be passed. I recommend removing the transform=None
functionality to *require* the transform be passed. If it is not,
then an exception will be raised and it will be easy to track down the
errant call.