MEP14: Improve text handling

Paul Hobson wrote:

···

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Michael Droettboom > <mdroe@...31...> wrote:

On 05/30/2013 02:27 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
>
> With a fully-function mathtex, it could be the default (only?) text
> layout system for MPL, simplifying things quite a bit.

I'm not sure that's realistic. The usetex backend gets a great deal of
use, and I don't think it's only because it handles multiline text
better -- it's also the easiest way to make the text match that of a
larger TeX document in which it's included (though the new PGF backend
goes some way to helping that in an entirely different way).

Exactly! I like that I can set text.usetex=True and add
\usepackage{fourier} and I *know* that my figures and document will look
the same.

That said, I've never been able to get the PGF backend to work well. Random
elements are pixelated. It's surely user-error on my end, but the usetex is
comparatively easy to set up.

It might
be worth collating a list of reasons that users are using "usetex" to
include in the MEP -- if we can address them all in another way, great,
but if not it's not too difficult to keep something that already works
fairly well working. The problem I have with it is not really that it
exists, only that it has tendrils all throughout matplotlib that could
be better localized into a single set of modules.

As I state above -- I absolutely require One Font throughout my documents.
If it's a serif font, I use the fourier TeX package. If it's a sans-serif
font, I do the weird \sansmath voodoo (I still owe you a PR with an example
of setting that up). Point is, it works well.

Cheers,
-paul

I had the impression that XeTeX had stopped development and that LuaTeX was
the path forward.