My mistake, sorry: gv (on both my Fedora 3 and my ubuntu dapper
machines) shows the xpdf one on a whole page, so that confused me.
But you are right: they have the same bounding box, so once embedded
in a latex document, they both show up just fine.
There are some differences in the PS header for both, and that's
probably what causes the difference in gv behavior which I mistook for
a bbox error.
Sorry for the noise: it looks like everything is in good shape now.
Many thanks for all this work! I am just in the middle of finishing
up a paper where I needed all of this, so your timing could not be
better.
Cheers,
f
···
On 7/10/06, Darren Dale <dd55@...163...> wrote:
Hi Fernando,
I tried opening your example of a bad eps file produced with the xpdf option,
and it looks identical to the good example you sent. (I opened it with both
ggv, and gv.)
I'm glad we got it all straightened out. Thanks for finding that bug before
version 0.88 was released.
···
On Monday 10 July 2006 14:08, Fernando Perez wrote:
On 7/10/06, Darren Dale <dd55@...163...> wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>
> I tried opening your example of a bad eps file produced with the xpdf
> option, and it looks identical to the good example you sent. (I opened it
> with both ggv, and gv.)
My mistake, sorry: gv (on both my Fedora 3 and my ubuntu dapper
machines) shows the xpdf one on a whole page, so that confused me.
But you are right: they have the same bounding box, so once embedded
in a latex document, they both show up just fine.
There are some differences in the PS header for both, and that's
probably what causes the difference in gv behavior which I mistook for
a bbox error.
Sorry for the noise: it looks like everything is in good shape now.
Many thanks for all this work! I am just in the middle of finishing
up a paper where I needed all of this, so your timing could not be
better.