Ok. Such a pain though... Are whole files acceptable
> instead of diffs? It's relatively easy to do a windiff or
Multiple contributions per patch are fine, just do like you did and
list what is in them. If there is an objection to part of the patch,
you may be asked to resubmit w/o the controversial parts, but if all
the changes look good the whole thing can go in. And we prefer svn
diffs over individual files.
Ken, would you like to be added to the devel list to handle some of
these patches. Just email me your sf id if so.
JDH
Great. Thanks John.
There was one other thing I forgot to mention.
I added two lines (+comment) in the backend_wx.py to select the
Pan/Zoom tool by default.
If you don't like that, then obviously just leave those lines out,
But I find that pan/zoom is what I want to do 90% of the time, and
zoom is the other 10%. "No tool" is what I want pretty much 0% of the
time (is there some use for no-tool mode that I'm missing?)
--bb
···
On 7/31/06, John Hunter <jdhunter@...5...> wrote:
> Ok. Such a pain though... Are whole files acceptable
> instead of diffs? It's relatively easy to do a windiff or
Multiple contributions per patch are fine, just do like you did and
list what is in them. If there is an objection to part of the patch,
you may be asked to resubmit w/o the controversial parts, but if all
the changes look good the whole thing can go in. And we prefer svn
diffs over individual files.
Ken, would you like to be added to the devel list to handle some of
these patches. Just email me your sf id if so.
JDH